How Pimen is characterized by his own words briefly. Chronicler Pimen in the tragedy Boris Godunov Pushkin essay about a monk

⁰

In the scene you read “Night. Cell in the Chudov Monastery” depicts the chronicler-monk Pimen. Describe him as a man and leto-scribe. How does he feel about the historical events he describes and the duties of a chronicler? Give examples from the text.

Pushkin wrote that in the character of the chronicler Pimen, he collected features that ancient chronicles breathe: innocence, touching meekness, something infantile and at the same time wise, zeal, lack of vanity, passion.

The chronicler Pimen deliberately limited his life to a cell: turning off from worldly fuss, he sees what is unknown to the majority, for he judges, in accordance with conscience, with moral laws. His goal as a chronicler is to tell the descendants of the truth about the events that took place in his native land.

Someday an industrious monk Will find my diligent, nameless work... He will rewrite true stories, - May the descendants of the Orthodox of the native land know the past fate, They commemorate their great kings For their labors, for glory, for good...

How does Gregory perceive his mentor, his spiritual appearance and chronicle work? Is he right that Pimen calmly looks at the right and the guilty, Listening to good and evil indifferently, Knowing neither pity nor anger?

Gregory respects Pimen for diligence, calmness, humility and majesty. He says that not a single thought is reflected on his forehead, and draws the erroneous conclusion that the elder is indifferent to what he describes in his writings. After all, Pimen will be the first to speak about the grave sin of the Russian people, who contributed to the accession of Boris. Conscientiousness, a heightened sense of personal responsibility for what is happening, is manifested in his image.

In what does Pimen see the dignity of power and ruler? What, from his point of view, does the well-known historical fact say that “Tsar John sought solace in the likeness of monastic labors”?

The rulers should be remembered for their labors, for glory, for good, Pimen believes. The desire of Tsar John (Ivan IV the Terrible) to seek solace in faith, monastic labors, his appeal to the Lord testifies to his repentance, awareness of his sins, that the burden of power became heavy for him.

How does Pimen tell about the murder of Tsar-Vitch Dimitri? Compare this story, its stylistic features, with the monologue "One more, last story ..." with the story about the kings. What characteristics does the chronicler give to the characters in this scene? How does this characterize Pi-men himself as a historian-chronicler who is going to conclude his chronicle with “this deplorable story”?

Impassibility leaves Pimen, who tells about a bloody crime, his story is emotional, full of evaluative comments: an evil deed, in despair, unconsciousness, ferocious, pale with anger, a villain; figurative verbs - dragged, trembled, howled. His style of narration becomes colloquial.

The “evil deed” he saw shocked the chronicler so much that since then he has little delved into worldly affairs and wants to move away from labors, transferring to others the right to describe human sins. Pimen's attitude to the narrator characterizes him as a citizen.

In the dialogue between Pimen and Gregory, the vain, worldly (feasts, battles, ambitious plans, etc.) and the divine, spiritual are contrasted. What is the meaning of this opposition? Why does Pimen give priority to monastic life over fame, luxury, and “women’s onion-howling love”?

Worldly life contains many temptations for man. They excite the blood and make them commit sinful acts. Monastic life humbles the spirit and the flesh, bestows inner harmony and tranquility. A person who is firm in faith comprehends the eternal, does not hold on to the momentary. Having experienced a lot in his life, Pimen retired from the bustle of the world to the monastery, where he found bliss and spends his days in labor and piety.

Reread the final remark of Gregory. What is the meaning of his prophecy? To whom do you think it belongs to a greater extent - Gregory or the author of the tragedy?

Gregory says:

And you will not escape from the court of the world, As you will not escape from God's judgment.

Power, given at the cost of crime, will lead the ruler to death - such is Pushkin's thought, expressed in the words of Grigory. material from the site

What problems - historical and moral - are considered by Pushkin in the scene you read from the tragedy "Boris Godunov"? What significance do they have for our modern times?

When creating "Boris Godunov", Pushkin relied on the book "History of the Russian State" by N. M. Karamzin. The poet highly appreciated the work of the historian, but he was protested by the convinced monarchism of the author of "History ...", who proclaimed that "the history of the people belongs to the sovereign." This formulation reflected the historical and philosophical concept

Karamzin: power, stability - in a strong state; statehood is the driving force of history. “The history of the people belongs to the people,” said the Decembrist Nikita Muravyov. The dispute that arose was historical and philosophical, and not just political, and Pushkin entered into a no-go. The tragedy "Boris Godunov" about the role of the people in history and the nature of tyrannical power. Power given at the cost of crime cannot be used for good; it will not bring happiness to either the ruler or the people, and such a ruler will inevitably become a tyrant. Revealing the historical doom of anti-popular power, Pushkin simultaneously showed the deep contradictory position of the people, combining strength and weakness. The people who chose the child-killer are also doomed.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page, material on the topics:

the image of Gregory in Boris Godunov
What, upon waking up, asks Pimen Grigory in an excerpt from the tragedy of A.S. Pushkin "Boris Godunov"
chronicler pimen from Pushkin's tragedy
Pimen and Gregory's relationship in Boris Godunov
boris godunov's story tragedy essay

Old Pimen is one of the minor characters in the famous tragedy "Boris Godunov" by A. S. Pushkin, written in 1825. However, this does not make it any less bright. The author collected this image of the “meek and humble old man” from N.M. Karamzin, as well as from the literature of the 16th century.

This hero is the monk-chronicler of the Chudov Monastery, the wisest and most respected elder, under whose command the young monk G. Otrepyev was.

Character characteristic

(People's Artist of the RSFSR Alexander Iosifovich Baturin as Pimen from the opera Boris Godunov)

The character of the elder Pimen, as the author himself admitted, is not his own invention. In it, the author combined the characteristic features of his favorite heroes from ancient Russian chronicles. Therefore, his hero has meekness, innocence, zeal, piety in relation to royal power (it was believed that it was given from God), wisdom. And although the author took quite a bit of space to characterize the old man, you can see how reverently he treats his hero. Pimen is not a simple warrior monk who is imbued with deep religious feelings. He is well educated and intelligent. In every event, the elder sees God's finger, therefore he never condemns anyone's actions. The hero also has some poetic gift, which connects him with the author himself - he writes a chronicle.

The image in the work

The hero of one of the scenes of the tragedy, old man Pimen, got a seemingly insignificant role. But this character performs an important function in the development of storylines, in the linkages of fundamental images and ideas. In the first picture, from the story of Shuisky, it becomes known about the regicide, which was committed in Uglich, the culprit of which is called Boris Godunov. However, Shuisky himself is an indirect witness who found “fresh traces” at the crime scene. Old Pimen is in fact the only real eyewitness among the other characters who personally saw the slaughtered Tsarevich Dimitri.

The fact of the death of the prince for Shuisky is trivial, like any other murder related to politics, because at that time there was no such thing. Pimen's assessment has a completely different tone. The old man is convinced that the sin of the murderer falls on everyone, for "we called the regicide our master."

(V.R. Petrov, opera "Boris Godunov", photographer and artist K.A., Fischer)

The words of the wise old man are far from being an ordinary moral assessment. Pimen really believes that the responsibility for the crime of one person falls on all of them.

Pimen does not even know about the consequences that this event will bring, but the monk has a unique ability - to anticipate trouble, which makes him humble and merciful. He encourages his descendants to be humble. It is here that the symmetrically opposite difference from the “court” of the Holy Fool, who refused Godunov to pray, manifests itself.

Pimen is trying to explain to Grigory Otrepyev that even for people like tsars, for whom life on earth seems to be in the best possible way, they cannot find their peace, and find it only in the schema. The story about Demetrius, in particular, the mention that he was the same age as Gregory, provokes an idea that determines the further development of events. Pimen makes Gregory an impostor, and without any intention of doing so. As a result of this fundamental vicissitudes, the plot of the work is pulled into its dramatic knot.

PIMEN is the central character in A.S. Pushkin’s tragedy “Boris Godunov” (1825), the monk-chronicler of the Chudov Monastery, “the meek and humble elder”, under whose command is the young monk Grigory Otrepyev, the future Pretender. The material for this image (as well as for others) Pushkin drew from N.M. Karamzin's History... (For example, P.'s story about the death of Fyodor Ioannovich is based on the work of Patriarch Job.) Pushkin wrote that P.'s character is not his invention: "In him I collected features that captivated me in our old chronicles." To these features, the poet attributed touching meekness, innocence, something infantile and at the same time wise, zeal, piety in relation to the power of the king, given by God. P. is the hero of one scene, the fifth picture of the tragedy. The role of P. is relatively small. However, the function of this character in the development of the plot, in the linkages of ideas and images, is important and significant. The collision of the tragedy in the scene with P. receives significant clarification. From the story of Shuisky in the first picture, it is known about the regicide committed in Uglich, its culprit is named - Boris Godunov. But Shuisky is an indirect witness, who found "fresh traces" at the scene of events. P. is the only eyewitness among the characters who saw with his own eyes the slaughtered prince, heard with his own ears how "the villains repented under the ax - and named Boris." For Shuisky, the death of Demetrius is trivial, like any political murder, of which there is no number. Vorotynsky also thinks in the same terms, although his reaction is more emotional: “Terrible villainy!” A completely different (in tone, in meaning) assessment of P .: “Oh terrible, unprecedented grief!” This grief is terrible and unprecedented because the sin of Boris falls on everyone, everyone turns out to be involved in it, for “we called the regicide lord to ourselves.” P.'s words are not just a moral assessment, which cannot be denied to Godunov himself (pangs of conscience torment him too). P. judges existentially: the crime was committed by one person, and everyone must answer. Unprecedented grief is coming, going to Rus', "a real misfortune to the Moscow state." (“A comedy about the real misfortune of the Moscow state ...” is one of the draft titles for Pushkin's tragedy.) P. does not yet know how this grief will manifest itself, but his foreboding makes the monk merciful. Therefore, he punishes the descendants to be humble: let them, remembering their kings, “for sins, for dark deeds, humbly beg the Savior.” Here a significant difference is revealed from the "court" of the Holy Fool, who refused to pray to Boris. The symmetry of these images, P. and Yurodivy, has long been noticed and studied, in particular, by V.M. Nepomnyashchiy. However, the proximity of the characters does not mean that they equally express the "voice of the people", "the voice of God." Pushkin's realism lies in the fact that each of his characters has his own "voice". The dramaturgy of the scene in the cell of the Chudov Monastery is built on the contrast of P.’s calmness (a constant epithet: “the past calmly and silently”, “his calm look”, “calmly looks at the right and the guilty”) and Grigory’s confusion, whose “peace of demonic dreams disturbed”. In the continuation of the whole scene, P. tries to convince Otrepyev of the futility of worldly pleasures and the bliss of monastic service. However, his memories of a merrily spent youth, of noisy feasts and battles, only inflame Gregory's imagination. The story about Demetrius, especially the careless mention - "he would be your age" - provokes a "wonderful thought" that will determine the further course of events. P., as it were, makes Gregory an impostor, and quite unintentionally. In the theory of drama, such an action is called peripety (according to Aristotle, "the change of what is being done into the opposite"). As a result of the vicissitudes, the plot of the tragedy is dragged into a dramaturgical knot. In the opera M.P. Mussorgsky's "Boris Godunov" (1868-1872), the role of P. was expanded. The composer (and the author of the libretto) gave him the story of the Patriarch (the fifteenth picture of the tragedy - “The Royal Thought”) about the miraculous insight of the blind shepherd in front of the coffin of Tsarevich Dimitri. In the opera, this story follows after the scene with the holy fool (in the tragedy - in front of her) and becomes the final blow of fate punishing the child murderer. The most famous performers of the role of P. are I.V. Samarin (Maly Theater, 1880), V.I. Kachalov (Moscow Art Theater, 1907); in the opera - V.R. Petrov (1905) and M.D. Mikhailov (1936).

One of the secondary characters of the work is the elderly monk Pimen, who lives in the cell of the Chudovo Monastery, located in Moscow.

Pimen is presented as a poet in the form of a chronicler describing the most important events that took place in the country. The monk is depicted as a gray-haired old man in a strict cassock with a high brow of a humble, majestic appearance, reminiscent of a deacon, distinguished by a humble, meek disposition. In the image of Pimen, the features of infancy and wisdom combined with each other, endowed with a certain creative talent, are noted.

The turbulent youth of Pimen passes in noisy fun and joy at the royal court, where the young man manages to enjoy the delights of life, even participating in military battles. However, Pimen feels the long-awaited bliss only after taking a monastic vow, understanding all the pettiness of worldly vain life.

During his long life, Pimen is a direct participant in many historical events in Russia, during the reign of Tsar Ivan the Terrible, becoming an unwitting witness to the murder of the young Tsarevich Dmitry in Uglich and the accusation of Boris Godunov of an attempt on the life of the Tsarevich, participating in the battles under the Kazan towers and repelling the attack of the Lithuanians during the Shuya battle.

The poet characterizes Pimen as a caring person who understands well the consequences of evil insidious deeds and considers good as the greatest human happiness. He has a negative attitude towards Boris Godunov, arguing that his ascension to the royal throne is an act committed against God's and the people's will by a man who stepped over the murder. Displaying the tragic events in the annals, Pimen tries to describe them as truthfully and restrainedly as possible.

The basis of bliss for Pimen lies in faithful service to the divine principle, reflecting on eternal peace and concentrating on the work of writing a chronicle, in the creation of which he sees his true human destiny, since Orthodox descendants must know the fate of their native land. Pimen creates his chronicle with special inspiration, experiencing extraordinary creative joy.

In the image of Pimen, the poet reveals the collective features of Russian chroniclers, characterized by simplicity, touching meekness, touching good nature, piety, creating breathing precious monuments of past times for grateful descendants.

Option 2

Pimen is an important character in the work of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin "Boris Godunov". This is a humble old man, a monk with a noble origin. In his youth, Pimen probably served in the army of Ivan the Terrible, since in the drama one can notice the words that Pimen at one time had a chance to see "the courtyard and luxury of John."

Pimen, in all likelihood, was not a simple warrior. Education markedly distinguished him from others. The abbot says that Pimen is a literate man, who read the monastery chronicles and wrote canons to the saints. All this directly tells the reader that in front of him is a difficult, educated, intelligent person with a talent for writing.

Pimen is busy writing a chronicle, the writing of which he considers his duty to the Lord. However, the chronicle remains unfinished, ending with a legend about the death of Tsarevich Dmitry. Conscience and good-heartedness do not allow the monk to write further, since he little, in his own words, "delved into the affairs of the world." But Pimen does not agree to trust the rumors.

Pimen is filled with love for his work, thanks to it he seemed to come to life again, he felt some new meaning of life in his advanced years. And, of course, he is worried about the further fate of the chronicle, he would like to put it in capable hands for continuation. And the choice falls on Gregory. Pimen gives him instructions, advice on how to continue his chronicle, but Gregory is not happy with his position. Pimen paternally reassures the novice, saying that luxury and wealth can captivate people only from afar, true peace cannot be found in the world.

Pimen is a deeply religious person, and this feeling goes well with his inner meekness. He doesn't get angry at anyone, he doesn't judge anyone. He sees the will of God in everything. Pimen does not condemn sinful kings with their cruel deeds; on the contrary, he prays to the Lord for indulgence towards them. The cause of the disasters that occurred during the reign of Boris Godunov, Pimen sees in the punishment of the Almighty, they say, it was not worth choosing a regicide as ruler. But, at the same time, according to Pimen, the king is the anointed of God, then a man, above whom only God. And if so, then who dares to tell the Tsar? The king can do anything.

Pushkin assigned Pimen not the biggest role. But the author hit the target - the image of the monk remains in the reader's memory for a long time.

Composition The image of the monk Pimen

From the most ancient times, there were people on our land who recorded all the events that happened to the country, and these people were called chroniclers. Pushkin, according to him, was very worried about the nature of these people: a humble, simple-hearted, sincere character. So he tried to realize such a person in his tragedy Boris Godunov.

Our chronicler's name is Pimen. Pimen is an old monk who has long abandoned his former life and humbly, as Pushkin spoke of the character of all chroniclers, writes his works. Pimen lives in the Chudov monastery in Moscow. Pimen considers it his duty to write a chronicle, he writes it even at night, without falling asleep at all.

It is noteworthy that in the appearance of Pimen lies the characteristic of Pushkin that he wanted to give: Pimen is humble, it is not clear in his face what he thinks about, what his views are and in what state. The old monk is so neutral to everything, as if indifferent, that impulses of emotions are not visible in him at all, he is on his own mind.

As I said earlier, Pimen came to the monastery not from a young age, but already at a mature age, when he had outlived a large part of his life in the “world”. In his youth, he was by no means a novice or a theologian. His youth was, on the contrary, turbulent and trembling. The chronicler monk served in the tsarist army and was even close to the tsar's court. He went through the war and the military regime in his life, which often appears to him in a dream, as a reminder of his past adventures. Pimen himself believes that in his past life he saw many blessings and pleasures, but he truly found happiness when he came to the monastery, when God brought him to the monastery of his future and gave him a vector in life, gave a new meaning to this life, allowed to touch the great - to faith and religion.

Pimen really had a stormy youth, because he caught both the reign of Ivan the Terrible, which he passionately talks about, and the murder of Tsarevich Dmitry, which is an integral part of the main plot, because it is Pimen who is appointed mentor to Grigory Otrepyev. Pimen and tells his student that Boris Godunov killed Tsarevich Dmitry with his accomplices. And Gregory decides to take advantage of this and, due to the fact that he was the same age as Dmitry, declares himself the surviving prince.

Chronicler monk.

Some interesting essays

Analysis of the collection Petersburg Tales of Gogol
Five works by N. V. Gogol are included in the Petersburg Tales cycle. They are connected by one idea and plan. The capital is Petersburg, its face is described in all five moments. This city symbolizes powerful Russia.

The work of a teacher is invaluable. After all, work with children and their upbringing is the future of the entire state. Every day, the teacher puts new and interesting information into the head of his students, which will someday be useful in life.

Everyone knows that the calendar winter comes on December 1, but in fact it can come much earlier. The first snow sometimes falls as early as September, but it quickly melts. For it to lay down, the soil must freeze.

Analysis of the work The Third Son of Platonov
The topic of relations between generations, in particular between parents and children, can safely be called eternal. It is relevant at all times, in all historical eras. This question is philosophical, over which one can argue and argue endlessly.

All people love to relax in nature. Some go to the forest on their day off, others go to the country, and someone enjoys walking in the nearest park.