Subscribe and read
the most interesting
articles first!

Is bazar a strong personality.

The philosophical social novel "Fathers and Sons" was written in 1861. In Russia, this time was marked by a stubborn socio-political struggle between noble liberalism and revolutionary democracy. Russian society was divided into two irreconcilable camps: on the one hand, there were revolutionary democrats, and on the other, liberals and conservatives.

Both of them perfectly understood the need for reforms in the country, but they saw their implementation in different ways: the democrats stood for fundamental changes in Russian society (perhaps through decisive changes), while the reactionaries and liberals were inclined to reform. Disputes between the two sides were over the main issues: attitudes towards landlord property, noble cultural heritage, issues of science and culture, art, moral principles, education of youth, duty to the fatherland, and the future of Russia.

Certainly, Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" reflects this controversy. In the center of his work, the writer depicts a hero with extraordinary views and high spiritual needs. In the novel, his ideas are tested; this is especially noticeable in Bazarov's clashes with other characters, and most importantly, with real life, nature, love, which, according to Turgenev, do not depend on any, even the most advanced philosophy. The author poses the main problem already in the title of the work.

Touching upon the conflict of two generations, the author himself realizes that this conflict is not only an attribute of the era of the 60s, but exists at all times and underlies the development of society. This contradiction marks the indispensable condition of progress. However, the difference in views arises not only because some heroes of the novel belong to the camp of "fathers", while others belong to the camp of "children".

Such an interpretation of the conflict would be incorrect, because in the work there are characters who, by age, belong to “children”, and by conviction - to “fathers”, therefore, one should not see the cause of the conflict only in age. The problem also lies in the fact that the "fathers" and "children" became spokesmen for the ideas of opposite eras (40-60s), representatives of different social strata: the old nobility, the aristocracy and the young revolutionary democratic intelligentsia. Thus, a purely psychological conflict develops into a deep social contradiction. The problem of confrontation between the nobility and revolutionary democrats is stated from the first pages of the novel. Already in the very description of the characters, the reader discovers the opposition. The author describes Bazarov as “a tall man in a long robe with tassels”, “long and thin, with a wide forehead, flat top, pointed nose, big green eyes and drooping sand-coloured sideburns”; his face expressed confidence and intelligence. The author focuses on the untidy, even somewhat sloppy appearance of the hero.

In the description of Pavel Petrovich, everything points to aristocratic over-fineness: “A dark English suite, a fashionable low tie and patent leather ankle boots”, “short-cropped hair” and a clean-shaven face. Turgenev also notices that Bazarov's hand was red and weathered, which indicates the hero's industriousness. The beautiful hand of Pavel Petrovich, “with long pink nails”, is the exact opposite of the hand of the protagonist.

So, the contrast of these images is obvious. Presenting a detailed portrait description of each of the characters, Turgenev once again recalls the discrepancy between form and content. The opposition of the two eras is also revealed by the disputes that Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov are waging. They talk about issues of the nation, about the essence of the materialistic approach, about the aristocracy. The principles of the new era of the 60s completely negate the principles of the old time. Whatever Kirsanov says about the benefits of the aristocracy, which “gave freedom to England,” Bazarov resolutely rejects everything: “May I spoil them, these district aristocrats.

After all, this is all self-love, lion's habits, fatness. Thus, the author wanted to portray a strong-minded commoner and weak nobles.

Their conflict develops throughout the novel, but never has a denouement. The writer, considering this confrontation from the outside, leaves the right to the future to resolve it. In addition to the theme of the generation, Turgenev touches on others in his work: love, nature, art, poetry. It is these universal values ​​that become the subject of discussion. Poetry is perceived by Bazarov as an absolutely useless thing.

"A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet," he declares. At the beginning of the novel, Nikolai Petrovich quotes lines about spring from Eugene Onegin. They correspond to the hero's poetic mood inspired by spring. Bazarov rudely interrupts Nikolai Petrovich.

He calls into question the very possibility of the influence of nature on the state of mind of man. Such is his attitude to all the phenomena of life: he evaluates everything from the point of view of usefulness. Bazarov considers nature in the same way. “Nature is not a temple, but a workshop,” he remarks. Bazarov does not perceive the organic world as something incomprehensible and unsolved. The hero speaks of nature as a workshop, where man is the master and everything is subject to his will and mind.

The evidence is not just arguments, but wildlife itself. The protagonist's views begin to be tested by life, as a result of which their failure is revealed.

“In the meantime, spring was taking its toll,” Turgenev says at the beginning of the novel and also ends it with a description of the “indifferent” and eternal nature in the cemetery. Here the writer continues the Pushkin tradition (the poem "Do I wander along the noisy streets ..."). Against the background of pictures of the organic world, the words of Bazarov. lose their significance, and the hero himself begins to understand his helplessness after meeting with Odintsova: “And part of the time, which. I will be able to live, so insignificant before eternity, where I am not and will not be .., ”Bazarov clearly expresses his attitude to love already at the beginning of the novel, completely not accepting the poetic side of this phenomenon:“ And what kind of mysterious relationship between a man and a woman? We physiologists know what these relationships are.”

If Nikolai Petrovich looks in the eyes of Bazarov only an "unrequited" sentimental contemplator, then Pavel Petrovich, who survived love, "simply did not take place as a person." Bazarov denies what has been deified for centuries, love, which has always been perceived as something highly spiritual, objective, tragic; all this is alien to him. “If you like a woman, try to get the point; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth hasn’t converged like a wedge. So, he takes care of Fenechka. Then Turgenev brings the hero to Odintsova, and the hero notices a change in himself: “Here you go!

Baba was scared." Finally, Bazarov realizes that he fell in love "stupidly, madly." The fact that he now contradicts himself, his theory, infuriates him. Similarly, Pavel Petrovich and Arkady are tested by love, but the outcome of their love is different from the outcome of Bazarov's love, which takes this feeling with him to the grave. In love for Katya, Arkady sees a strong feeling, mutual understanding, and simple, uncomplicated happiness. Pavel Petrovich, who “put his whole life on the line of female love,” was unable to withstand this test.

It is no coincidence that Turgenev shows his tender attitude towards Fenechka, which refutes the depth of feeling felt for Princess R. In this, this character is opposed to Bazarov. At the compositional level, this was expressed in the fact that the love story of Pavel Petrovich for Princess R. precedes the love story of Bazarov for Odintsova.

Bazarov himself, who once suggested to Arkady "to study the anatomy of the eye", is faced with Odintsova's "mysterious smile" and her "strange calmness". She resembles a beautiful statue, cold and inaccessible. Odintsova embodies the ideal, harmony, which has been sung by artists and poets more than once. Now Bazarov is struck by this harmony: another principle of his philosophy begins to waver - a nihilistic attitude towards art.

“Rafael is not worth a penny,” he once said. So, Bazarov, unwittingly, changes, his philosophical theory crashes, falling into the test of love. Subconsciously, he resigns himself to his defeat, and his speech changes: “Blow on the dying lamp and let it go out,” he exclaims poetically, although at the beginning of the novel he reproached Arkady for eloquence. Bazarov himself thought that he would live a long time, but life proved the opposite, resorting to an absurd accident. In the final picture, Turgenev depicts nature, which speaks of "eternal reconciliation and endless life."

Bazarov refuted the organic world as something romantic and poetic, and now nature denies the hero and all his principles with her beauty and perfection. In his work, Turgenev raises the question of the future of Russia. The problem of who the future of the state belongs to is one of the most important in the novel. Bazarov can only break the old, but he himself cannot create anything new. The writer "kills" his hero. However, he also leaves the liberals no right to the future. People like Pavel Petrovich are not able to lead the country, because their convictions do not have a solid ideological basis.

It was created in the era of cardinal transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 1950s, there is an upsurge in public life of the democratic movement, the principles of which are strikingly different from those that prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a “new” person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of a new generation - this is the task that Turgenev set himself. He embodied his idea in the novel "Fathers and Sons".

Using the example of Bazarov, he showed the most typical features of the commoners-democrats of the 60s. The protagonist of the novel is tragic in everything. Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. Denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it. Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism, he is extremely rational and materialistic. “Bazarov was a great hunter of women and female beauty, but love in the sense of the ideal, or, as he put it, romantic, he called rubbish, unforgivable nonsense, considered knightly feelings to be something like deformity or illness ...

“If you like a woman,” he said, “try to get the point; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth hasn’t converged like a wedge ... ”Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, create a family and find personal. Because of his critical views on people (“All people are similar to each other both in body and soul ...”) it is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with anyone. One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness.

The chief does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully imbue nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who outwardly tries to appear like him, is not completely sure of the legitimacy of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the main character loves them, in many ways he does not approve of their lives, and even condemns them.

That is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents “speak different languages”, they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the protagonist is unhappy, she is unrequited and tragic in him. The feeling is born in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of his composition with alloc. ru 2005 existence. Bazarov is trying to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless.

He, with all his ideas, does not stand the "test of love." After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes take place in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer firm in his views, as before, he begins to waver.

A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov's soul, which must somehow be resolved. The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel, it was his last attempt to find happiness and “understanding. The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov's worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The protagonist no longer feels like a “master in the workshop of nature”, but compares himself to a grain of sand in a vast world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to acquire his mission of “clearing space” for building a new society.

“Well, he will live in a white hut, and burdock will grow out of me, well, and then?” Bazarov, undoubtedly, appeared too early in society, he is not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel. With the departure from life, the resolution of the conflict in the soul of the hero is connected.

This is the death of a giant who is aware of his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving life, a certain reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he ceases to hide his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents. In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov. The author does not create a feeling of a tragic end, since the ending itself is epicly calm, the story goes in a philosophical direction.

Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and that, despite the death of the hero, it continues.

Need a cheat sheet? Then save - "Is Bazarov a strong personality? . Literary writings!

The novel "Fathers and Sons" rightfully plays a leading role in the work of I. S. Turgenev. This work was created in an era of cardinal transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 1950s, there is an upsurge in public life of the democratic movement, the principles of which are strikingly different from those that prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a “new” person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of a new generation - this is the task that Turgenev set himself. He embodied his idea in the novel "Fathers and Sons". Using the example of the image of Bazarov, the author showed the most typical features of the raznochintsy-democrats of the 60s.
The protagonist of the novel is tragic in everything.
Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. Denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it.
Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism, he is extremely rational and materialistic.
“Bazarov was a great hunter of women and female beauty, but love in the sense of the ideal, or, as he put it, romantic, he called rubbish, unforgivable nonsense, considered chivalrous feelings to be something like ugliness or illness ...” “Do you like a woman , - he said, - try to get the point; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth hasn’t converged like a wedge ... ”
Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, start a family and find personal happiness.
Because of his critical views on people (“All people are similar to each other both in body and soul ...”) it is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with someone.
One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness. The protagonist does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully imbue nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who outwardly tries to appear like him, is not completely sure of the legitimacy of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the protagonist loves them, he largely disapproves of their way of life, and even condemns them. That is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents “speak different languages”, they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the protagonist is unhappy, she is unrequited and tragic in him.
Feeling is born in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of its existence. Bazarov is trying to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless. He, with all his ideas, does not stand the "test of love." After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes take place in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer firm in his views, as before, he begins to waver. A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov's soul, which must somehow be resolved.
The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel, it was his last attempt to find happiness and "understanding.
The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov's worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The protagonist no longer feels like a “master in the workshop of nature”, but compares himself to a grain of sand in a vast world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to acquire his mission of “clearing space” for building a new society. “Well, he will live in a white hut, and burdock will grow out of me, well, and then?”
Bazarov, undoubtedly, appeared too early in society, he is not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel.
With the departure from life, the resolution of the conflict in the soul of the hero is connected. This is the death of a giant who is aware of his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving life, a certain reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he ceases to hide his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents.
In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov.
The author does not create a feeling of a tragic end, since the ending itself is epicly calm, the story goes in a philosophical direction. Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and the fact that, despite the death of the hero, life goes on.

N. V. Gogol entered literature as an unsurpassed master of laughter. Gogol's stories, his poem "Dead Souls" are simple in plot, transparent in disassembling the characters. And yet there is an unsolved and unresolved mystery of Gogol and the mystery of this laughter. N.V. Gogol laughs at stupid, funny, scary, vulgar things, but his laugh is sad. This sadness is the result of a tragic discrepancy between the ideal and the ordinary, dream and reality. Not everything is simple with N.V. Gogol and in choosing the object of ridicule. He can have a ridiculous robber, Captain Kopeikin, and a terrible, zealous owner Sobakevich. Gogol

The fables of I. A. Krylov are an excellent school of observations of life, phenomena, characters. Fables are of interest both in dynamic plots and in the depiction of the characters of the characters, in particular animals, insects, birds. However, animals, insects and fish in fables, according to the exact expression of I. Franko, "wink at people with one eyebrow." So every read fable causes a person to think. Reading the fable "Demyan's stew", you understand: the story that the author tells is not at all about specific Demyan and Fock, and not about stew and excessive hospitality. Demyan personifies such traits as obsession,

Zaporozka Sich is one of the phenomena of the world, over which they prayed, which they tried to guess richly from generations of famous people. Zvityazhny Zaporizhzhya became the heroes of impersonal literary and mystical creations. Velmy wrote belonging to the Cossacks Taras Grigorovich Shevchenko. To this very reason, having so intently embraced the splendid vibrancy of his works, 1 it is not surprising that the image of a Cossack is one of the main ones in his poetic dorobka. Already in the early period of the Kobzar's work, to become a Cossack-litsar, a defender of the people, his will

Is Bazarov a strong personality?

The novel "Fathers and Sons" rightfully plays a leading role in the work of I. S. Turgenev. This work was created in an era of cardinal transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 1950s, there is an upsurge in public life of the democratic movement, the principles of which are strikingly different from those that prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a "new" person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of a new generation - this is the task that Turgenev set himself. He embodied his idea in the novel "Fathers and Sons". Using the example of the image of Bazarov, the author showed the most typical features of the raznochintsy-democrats of the 60s.
The protagonist of the novel is tragic in everything.
Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. Denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it.
Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism, he is extremely rational and materialistic.
“Bazarov was a great hunter of women and female beauty, but love in the sense of the ideal, or, as he put it, romantic, he called rubbish, unforgivable nonsense, considered chivalrous feelings to be something like deformity or illness ...” “Do you like a woman , - he said, - try to get a sense; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth hasn’t converged like a wedge ... "
Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, start a family and find personal happiness.
Because of his critical views on people ("All people are similar to each other both in body and soul ..."), it is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with anyone.
One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness. The protagonist does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully imbue nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who outwardly tries to appear like him, is not completely sure of the legitimacy of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the protagonist loves them, he largely disapproves of their way of life, and even condemns them. That is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents "speak different languages", they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the protagonist is unhappy, she is unrequited and tragic in him.
Feeling is born in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of its existence. Bazarov is trying to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless. He, with all his ideas, does not stand the "test of love." After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes take place in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer firm in his views, as before, he begins to waver. A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov's soul, which must somehow be resolved.
The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel, it was his last attempt to find happiness and "understanding.
The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov's worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The protagonist no longer feels like a "master in the workshop of nature", but compares himself to a grain of sand in a vast world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to acquire his mission of "clearing space" for building a new society. "Well, he will live in a white hut, and burdock will grow out of me, well, and then?"
Bazarov, undoubtedly, appeared too early in society, he is not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel.
With the departure from life, the resolution of the conflict in the soul of the hero is connected. This is the death of a giant who is aware of his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving life, a certain reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he ceases to hide his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents.
In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov.
The author does not create a feeling of a tragic end, since the ending itself is epicly calm, the story goes in a philosophical direction. Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and the fact that, despite the death of the hero, life goes on.

The novel "Fathers and Sons" rightfully plays a leading role in the work of I. S. Turgenev. This work was created in an era of cardinal transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 1950s, there is an upsurge in public life of the democratic movement, the principles of which are strikingly different from those that prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a “new” person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of a new generation - this is the task that Turgenev set himself. He embodied his idea in the novel "Fathers and Sons". Using the example of the image of Bazarov, the author showed the most typical features of the raznochintsy-democrats of the 60s.
The protagonist of the novel is tragic in everything.
Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. Denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it.
Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism, he is extremely rational

And materialistic.
“Bazarov was a great hunter for women and for female beauty, but love in the sense of the ideal, go, as he put it, romantic, he called rubbish, unforgivable nonsense, considered knightly feelings to be something like deformity or illness.” “If you like a woman,” he said, “try to get the point; but it’s impossible - well, don’t, turn away - the earth did not converge like a wedge.
Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, start a family and find personal happiness.
Because of his critical views on people (“All people are similar to each other both in body and soul.”) It is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with anyone.
One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness. The protagonist does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully imbue nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who outwardly tries to appear like him, is not completely sure of the legitimacy of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the protagonist loves them, he largely disapproves of their way of life, and even condemns them. That is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents “speak different languages”, they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the protagonist is unhappy, she is unrequited and tragic in him.
Feeling is born in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of its existence. Bazarov is trying to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless. He, with all his ideas, does not stand the "test of love." After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes take place in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer firm in his views, as before, he begins to waver. A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov's soul, which must somehow be resolved.
The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel, it was his last attempt to find happiness and understanding.
The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov's worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The protagonist no longer feels like a “master in the workshop of nature”, but compares himself to a grain of sand in a vast world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to acquire his mission to “clear space” for building a new society. “Well, he will live in a white hut, and burdock will grow out of me, well, and then?”
Bazarov, undoubtedly, appeared too early in society, he is not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel.
With the departure from life, the resolution of the conflict in the soul of the hero is connected. This is the death of a giant who is aware of his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving life, a certain reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he ceases to hide his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents.
In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov.
The author does not create a feeling of a tragic end, since the ending itself is epicly calm, the story goes in a philosophical direction. Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and the fact that, despite the death of the hero, life goes on.

  1. “Fathers and Sons” is one of the eternal works of Russian literature. And not only because new generations of readers perceive the difficult position of the author differently, but also because the novel captures ...
  2. The story of Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev "Bezhin Meadow" is included in the writer's book of stories and essays under the general title "Notes of a Hunter". This book has a sharp anti-serf orientation. It reflected Turgenev's sympathy for...
  3. In Turgenev's story "Bezhin Meadow" the story is told on behalf of the hunter Ivan Petrovich. Toward night, he got lost and wandered into the Bezhin Meadow, where he meets five village boys. Hunter, listening to their conversation,...
  4. Asya in Turgenev's story is a girl who has a richly gifted nature, not the corruption of light, smart, has retained purity of feelings, simplicity and sincerity of the heart; she has a very captivating and spontaneous nature without ...
  5. I. S. Turgenev owns a wonderful formula: language = people. Having spent most of his life abroad, a connoisseur of many foreign languages, I. S. Turgenev never ceased to admire the Russian language, calling it “great ...
  6. Gerasim hoped that Mumu would be forgotten and he would again be able to take care of his pet. It is at this stage that it is time to think about how we will lead readers to the solution of the question: why ...
  7. The Russian reality of the early 60s put forward a new type of “nihilist”, calling for a resolute struggle against the whole old world, its way of life, customs, culture, without making exceptions for anyone, without experiencing any ...
  8. The problem of fathers and children can be called eternal. But it is especially aggravated at turning points in the development of society, when the older and younger generations become spokesmen for the ideas of two different eras. It's that kind of time...
  9. No, Rudin's face is not pitiful, as it is customary to treat him, this is an unfortunate person, but Timely and who has done a lot of good. M. Gorky Turgenev began work on the novel "Rudin" in ...
  10. The problem of fathers and children can be called eternal. But it is especially aggravated at turning points in the development of society, when the older and younger generations become spokesmen for the ideas of two different eras. It's that kind of time...
  11. There is no shame in bowing before him. N. Nekrasov The life of I. S. Turgenev, the famous Russian writer, took place in one of the most eventful eras in the life of Russia. It was during this period, at the beginning ...
  12. Almost a century and a half has passed since Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" was first published. The author wrote it in a difficult time - the period of preparation and implementation of the peasant reform. Now,...
  13. KALINYCH is the hero of I. S. Turgenev’s story “Khor and Kalinych” (1847) from the cycle “Notes of a Hunter”. In contrast to Khor, the hero of the same story, K. symbolizes the poetic side of the Russian national character. Household life...
  14. Did I want to scold Bazarov Or exalt him? I don't know it myself, for I don't know whether I love him or hate him. I. S. Turgenev Roman “Fathers and Sons”...
  15. The novel "Rudin" was written in 1855 within two months. The process of creating the work coincided with the events of the Crimean War of 1853-1855. I. S. Turgenev considered it necessary to evaluate ...
  16. The novel by I. S. Turgenev “The Nest of Nobles” is distinguished by the simplicity of the plot and at the same time by the deep development of characters. The author shows the ideological disputes of that time, in which the main opponents are Lavretsky and...
  17. Kirsanov Arkady Nikolaevich - a young nobleman, friend and student of Bazarov. But, unlike Bazarov, his passion for nihilism is superficial. A.K. is attracted to this teaching by a sense of freedom, independence from traditions ...
  18. Russian classics of the 19th century are mainly associated with the culture of the upper Russian class. The nobility not only nominated the most prominent writers (only Goncharov and Chekhov were among the writers of the first magnitude - of non-noble origin), not ...
  19. The very name “Fathers and Sons” suggests that it is built on antithesis. In the novel, disputes between characters, conflicts between characters, their painful reflections, tense dialogues play an important role. The plot is based on...
  20. In the story "Bezhin Meadow" Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev describes the "night". Now we no longer know what it is, so I read this story with particular interest. Walking at night is...


Join the discussion
Read also
Dough preparation: Break 3 eggs into a bowl
How to marinate poultry in mayonnaise
Message from Governor Alexei Dyumin: Transcript